Don't Rely Only on FEMA Maps; Some "Low Risk" Houses Flooded in the Past 30 Years
- Adam Garrett
- Jan 9
- 3 min read
Updated: Jan 10

If a property is in flood zone X, it means that, per FEMA, it is the least likely to flood. It includes even ski slopes and mountain peaks since zone X is the default zone for properties of the lowest risk. However, sometimes, contrary to popular belief, as you can see from the picture above, areas within zone X have flooded in the past 30 years.
Zone X, the Least Likely Area to Flood, as viewed on Massanutten Mountain w/ Ski Slopes
Zone X is the least likely area to flood, or at least they are supposed to be. Here are some pics from Massanutten Mountain, where I've skied on at least a few occasions in Virginia:


Looking on MLS Feed for Flood Zones
How to look at the FEMA map from directly within the Matrix portal that is common in Central & Eastern Virginia across most Multiple Listing Services
Don't Rely Exclusively on the FEMA Flood Zones & Many 3rd Party Services That Rely on Them
Whether MLS or a public resource, don't rely exclusively on FEMA maps; aim for First Street maps.
The best free public-facing integrated option I've seen for flood zones is pulled from First Street, and available on Realtor.com, i.e.:


Work with an Agent with a Paid Subscription to First Street to See Data Like Flood Projections & Historic Flood Maps from Flood Events
Here is an example similar to what you'd see on First Street, except you can change it based on the % chance of flooding or the timing based on projections:

Understand that Flood Events Are Getting Much Worse Over Time Faster than Many Realize: See 15 Year Projections on 1st Street
Homeownership is best in the long term, holding onto it rather than bouncing to another property & selling your current property. The image in the section immediately above this one is very different than the 15-year projection for the same area below:

1 Year Probability Isn't Sufficient Even on 1st Street
Hurricane Isabel's flooding, per 1st Street, has a less than 1% chance of happening again in some locations at the levels seen then. I think that's being too conservative personally.
Here's a 1% probability map of a property:

See this property now in Hurricane Isabel terms:

To be Warned of Numerous Potential Hazards, for Buyers, I recommend...
Doing your own due diligence on area factors (i.e. environmental factors) & property factors by year, especially regarding matters your agent isn't able to share with you candidly about due to potential legal issues (i.e. crime).
Diligently search to find a buyer's agent or broker who is both highly knowledgeable and exceptionally honest. They do exist, and they don't always do a ton of sales or have hundreds of reviews. The top agents by volume sell themselves well. The top agents, as in my case, sometimes don't have high volume in part due to little things like not having good enough SEO on their website and not wanting to pay high referral fees on leads (i.e. 50% of their gross commission, before their split with their firm).
If buying in Adam's coverage area, consider Adam as a potential agent. If outside of it, consider a referral from him.
Buyer beware.



Comments